Saturday, November 17, 2007

Using Mankiw's principle #4 (people aren't that stupid), New York schools begin to provide incentives for achievement

and I think it's a reasonable idea. Consider the tradeoffs: get what you already have (poor, underachieving students) or risk very little (what really is the cost of 15,000 cellphones and the minutes given as a reward?) The only real risk I can see is the liability involved in giving phones to these kids. And while I don't think it will have overwhelming success (I'm really more interested to see what it will do) I don't think it will be ineffective either. And really, what is the cost? Think about this objection and you tell me whether this fellow has watched the video below:

“You engage in learning because it develops you for future activities, because you are investing in yourself for a future reward,” she said. “What this is doing is instead creating an immediate tangible reward that will obscure that.”

Do you think these kids see development for future activities as their reward? Do you think many of these kids view long-term goals as tangible? It may be that creating a system of performance and reward for these kids will help establish the idea that long-term performance yields long-term reward. That would be a great accomplishment.

2 comments:

Brent said...

I've got it... Scrap the cell phones, and give them all Kindles, since no one will buy one of those after they read your scathings. But I bet that was part of your plan from the start, eh? Well-played, well-played...:-)

Micah said...

but kids are smart enough to see through that smokescreen, and they'll be "leaving" their kindles at parks, on the bus, in their dogs' mouths, etc.